leftys_rock
|
History of tennisHey, i'm doing a speech for public speaking about the history of tennis, do any of you know some good websites where I could get some info?
|
Adie
|
http://www.cliffrichardtennis.org/planet_tennis/history.htm
Hope this will help.
|
leftys_rock
|
Thanks!
|
Adie
|
Hope it helps a little
|
x.doublea
|
leftys, here's some info from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis#History
You should also do some research on the influence of other sports on tennis (Ex. golf), as well as the original game (Real Tennis). To add a little spice, you can also compare it to other racquet sports.
|
leftys_rock
|
@ Pierce, Mauresmo, and Sharapova as being some of the greatest womens players of the Open Era.
|
x.doublea
|
As you can see, there strictly using Grand Slam winners with over two wins. It is a bit funny though.
|
PSALT
|
| leftys_rock wrote: | @ Pierce, Mauresmo, and Sharapova as being some of the greatest womens players of the Open Era. |
sad, isn't it? Even with two Slams Sharapova has a long way to go to be as great as the likes of Conchita Martinez and a few others who weren't on the list. She has yet to prove that she can be a top player for a long time, something that is in some ways better than winning Slams.
|
x.doublea
|
I'm a member there, so I'll challenge that right now.
|
x.doublea
|
Ok, I have made my statement on the page:
History of Tennis: "Greatest" Tennis Players
I would like to enquire, how can the article consider anyone with more than one Grand Slam title "one of the greatest". Mary Pierce? One of the greats along side Martina Navratilova? Doesn't make any sense to me. This list should be consisted of players with remarkable Slam achievements (like, at least 3-4 titles) and consisted of champions who were great advocates to the games. How can the "greatest tennis players" be considered someone who won more than two slams? Doublea 04:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
|
leftys_rock
|
That's the problem w/ Wikipedia. People can change the stuff on there, so it's not a "reliable" source. But that was amusing.
|
x.doublea
|
No, I just think they weren't thinking there. I love Wikipedia... I'm part of the "OperaProject there"... just, sometimes, you've got to question these things. There is a group of "Wikipedians" who do believe that you should have to register in order to participate. In this case, I think it was logical, just not too logical, if you know what I mean.
|
stevos14
|
Sharapova IS the greatest of the open era though...okay even I dont think that...yet.
PS Doublea how was tennis influenced by golf? Im curious.
|
leftys_rock
|
| x.doublea wrote: | | No, I just think they weren't thinking there. I love Wikipedia... I'm part of the "OperaProject there"... just, sometimes, you've got to question these things. There is a group of "Wikipedians" who do believe that you should have to register in order to participate. In this case, I think it was logical, just not too logical, if you know what I mean. |
We are currently not allowed to use it for research projects. It's nice for a quick lookup, but it's because of how people can change info on there. It might be inconsistant if we cite it.
|
x.doublea
|
Well, about 95% of the stuff is confirmed correct. Wikipedia can sometimes make Britanica look like a joke. They have like a full 15 pages on Andre... Britanica has around three-quarters of a page on him...and it is out of date. You can always use some of the links at the bottom of the Wikipedia articles as website research sources.
|
Tennis fan
|
Yeah but they don't allow us to use Wikipedia in school. They keep saying it is inaccurate and all kinds of stuff. The school subcribes to many other on-line resources for research... our librarians get allergic reactions if we go on it in the library computers... but I agree with doublea. I always find so much stuff on wikipedia and hardly find anything on the other sites. So I do use it (at home) knowing that there could be inacuracies.
Anyhow, I had a good laugh when I saw Leftys' post...
|
Tennis fan
|
Lefty's you can finds lots of GS statistics here
Records and statistics for all tennis grand slam tournament finals since the first Wimbledon Championship in 1877 until 2004
Adie also gave a good link
|
|
|