Percy896's Tennis Forum This is a new tennis forum to discuss professional tennis, vote and create polls, and ask advice about equipment, fitness, or anything regarding tennis! Now with a new Fantasy Tennis League!
Posted: Sun Dec 18, 2005 4:16 pm Post subject: WTA Ranking System Change
The WTA has announced that they are changing their ranking system. There will no longer be quality points (extra points awarded for beating higher ranked players), and Grand Slam winners and Tier I winners get more points. Do you think this is a good change? _________________ -Site Admin
I'm a little confused also about this new ranking system. I think it's good to give more pts. for wins in the big events, but I'm surprised players aren't rewarded more for beating the better players. So many players know how to "play the system" and get high rankings for a lot of quantity but few quality wins.
I'm a little confused also about this new ranking system. I think it's good to give more pts. for wins in the big events, but I'm surprised players aren't rewarded more for beating the better players. So many players know how to "play the system" and get high rankings for a lot of quantity but few quality wins.
I think there are some good things about it and some not. The good thing is giving more points to the GS winners. The bad thing is practically everything else. Tier I winners should not get more points, and quality points should remain. It should be better to beat davenport in the 2nd round of Wimbledon than to beat sugiyama. So now, if someone does upset davenport in the 2nd round if wimby, they only get points for getting into the 3rd round. That is not right.
I think there are some good things about it and some not. The good thing is giving more points to the GS winners. The bad thing is practically everything else. Tier I winners should not get more points, and quality points should remain. It should be better to beat davenport in the 2nd round of Wimbledon than to beat sugiyama. So now, if someone does upset davenport in the 2nd round if wimby, they only get points for getting into the 3rd round. That is not right.
I'm a little confused also about this new ranking system. I think it's good to give more pts. for wins in the big events, but I'm surprised players aren't rewarded more for beating the better players. So many players know how to "play the system" and get high rankings for a lot of quantity but few quality wins.
Enter: Petrova and Schnyder. Getting to the WTA Champs based on quantity alone, disgraceful and undeserving. _________________ Tennis is in the mind...
not the body.
I'm a little confused also about this new ranking system. I think it's good to give more pts. for wins in the big events, but I'm surprised players aren't rewarded more for beating the better players. So many players know how to "play the system" and get high rankings for a lot of quantity but few quality wins.
Enter: Petrova and Schnyder. Getting to the WTA Champs based on quantity alone, disgraceful and undeserving.
I SO agree. I couldn't believe when I heard that they were in the tour champs and venus williams wasn't. Even serena, with her awful playing, are better than them.
I'm a little confused also about this new ranking system. I think it's good to give more pts. for wins in the big events, but I'm surprised players aren't rewarded more for beating the better players. So many players know how to "play the system" and get high rankings for a lot of quantity but few quality wins.
Enter: Petrova and Schnyder. Getting to the WTA Champs based on quantity alone, disgraceful and undeserving.
I SO agree. I couldn't believe when I heard that they were in the tour champs and venus williams wasn't. Even serena, with her awful playing, are better than them.
yeah but was was extremly surprised that patty was in it _________________
ya im a little confused w/ the new ranking system too....but with what u guys are saying i understand it better..... _________________ www.freewebs.com/tenniswallpapers by myself and x.doublea
GS winners of 06! Mauresmo(AO, Wimbledon), Henin-Hardenne(FO), Sharapova(USO), Federer(AO, Wimbledon, USO), and Nadal(FO)
The WTA is doing the right thing with their ranking system modification. There should be no reason why players should be awarded extra points for beating high ranked-players. When players beat high ranked-players, they still move through the draw the same way as they do if they beat a lower ranked-player; they just have to play a better match. So, really, awarding extra-points is not really fair to other players.
Awarding more points to Grand Slam and Teir-I champions is very good. The WTA probably wants this increase of points available to attract higher ranked players and force them into participating in as many Teir-I tournaments as they can. The WTA doesn't want to see another 2004 Indian-Wells-Miami attendance problem, where only half of the Top 10 showed up in both tournaments.
how do players get 0.5 of a point?? _________________ www.freewebs.com/tenniswallpapers by myself and x.doublea
GS winners of 06! Mauresmo(AO, Wimbledon), Henin-Hardenne(FO), Sharapova(USO), Federer(AO, Wimbledon, USO), and Nadal(FO)
All times are GMT - 5 Hours Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Next
Page 1 of 6
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum